Friday, January 16, 2009
Well, I was writing a blog post, and instead of saving I just banked on leaving my Writer window open. Then I accidentally pulled the plug on my laptop without having the battery in. Which leaves me with this and a problem of forgetting what I was writing about.
First, while I have most reader’s attention, how about a claim that our universe could be fundamentally 2-D? A theory has stated that we could be living holograms reflected off of the fundamental 2-D waves of our universe. I love this stuff. It seems so far out there, but for those who keep open minds to even the most preposterous of things (as long as evidence is available, not something like religion, etc.) this is some fun stuff. Let me know what you think about this finding; I love discussions on this type of stuff!
The article that I linked to talks in great detail on this possibility; it is a fun read if nothing else.
Moving on, I think I will talk about my two philosophy classes this semester. Bear in mind that I do not have many talking points on these topics, as I have not previously been too in-depth with them. The first one that I am excited about is Modality. This will concern modal logic and trying to conclude, by appealing to alternative possible worlds, the necessity or possibility of certain apparent-truths or falsities. (I think that is a good way of putting it.)
The second class I am excited about is Philosophy of Language. The following proof is one of the more commonly found intro-day-stumpers as provided by the professor:
1. Nothing is better than happiness.
2. A sandwich is better than nothing.
∴ 3. A sandwich is better than happiness.
Now, we all can see that something is wrong there, but how can that be represented? The word nothing is stationary, but it seems to bring implications with it. Based on my extremely limited knowledge on this topic, I think that this distinction does come from the implications of nothing, i.e. “Nothing (that is good) is better than happiness,” and, “A sandwich is better than nothing (to eat).” But, I’m not sure if I can make a simple distinction like that or not.
This should be a fun time this semester. No sarcasm. (Seriously!)
Labels: language, modality, philosophy, science, universe
3 comments:
buy sublingual viagra online buy cheap viagra online viagra 6 free samples does watermelon have viagra effect female use of viagra viagra soft tabs buy sublingual viagra online buy cheap viagra online uk viagra lawyer columbus sublingual viagra viagra free sites computer find which is better cialis or viagra free sample pack of viagra viagra dosage
hi all
http://www.tor.com/community/users/idwancakent1983
http://www.tor.com/community/users/orerahex1978
http://www.tor.com/community/users/flagathalear1982
http://www.tor.com/community/users/meoumosino1988
http://www.tor.com/community/users/rensperfzareal1977
Never conduct a balance transfer to the incorrect good reasons. If you have looked at each of the information plus it noises excellent, you must make positive it is actually nonetheless really worth the trouble. How long have you been with all the other firm and the amount of money is that this planning to help save you? [url=http://www.ss12w12ws.info]Obse8ighve[/url]
Post a Comment